GALAXY EXPRESS (GX)In contrast to the SpaceX Falcon private commercial development
effort and Europe's all-government Vega program, Japan's Galaxy Express was a
government-commericial partnership.
Galaxy Express Corporation was
established in March 2001 to develop a new medium commercial launch vehicle, initially
named J-2 (or J1-Upgrade), but renamed Galaxy Express (GX) in January 2003. The program was originally intended to provide a
lower-cost replacement for Japan's J1 rocket. J1
had been cancelled by spiraling costs after performing only one suborbital mission in
1996.
The company was formed by seven Japanese
companies, including Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. (IHI), Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries Corp., Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd., IHI Aerospace Co. (the former Nissan
Aerospace), Japan Aviation Electronics Industry Ltd., Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. and
Kokusai Sohko Co.. Lockheed Martin of the United
States later signed on as a shareholder.
Galaxy Express was capitalized at
$820,000, with launch vehicle development expected to cost $325-400 million. Plans called for the Japanese government to pay
two-thirds of the development cost. The new
rocket was expected to fly in 2005 and to enter revenue service in 2006.
Initial plans called for the new launch
vehicle to use a liquid oxygen/kerosene first stage based on stainless steel balloon-type
Atlas tanks provided by Lockheed Martin. The
stage was to be powered by a single NK-33 engine from Aerojet. The second stage was to be powered by a new
liquid natural gas (LNG)/liquid oxygen (LOX) pressure-fed engine developed by IHI.
Several months after Galaxy Express was
formed, GX plans shifted toward the use of the already-existing Atlas III first stage
powered by an Energomash RD-180 instead of an NK-33. This
change coincided with Lockheed Martins investment in the company.
GX was designed to lift 4.4 metric tons
(tonnes) to low earth orbit, or 1.4 tonnes to geosynchronous transfer orbit, giving it
roughly the lifting capability of a Delta 2 or Soyuz/Fregat.
GX was expected to perform 3-4 commercial and/or government launches per
year. Payloads could include mobile
communications, geodetic survey, navigation, weather, information gathering, land survey,
space science, research and experimentation. GX
would lift off from the old "N"/H-1 "Osaki" pad at Tanegashima Space Center
located several miles south of the H-IIA "Yoshinobu" launch site.
Initially, few took note of what in
hindsight was an obvious schizophrenic element of the GX design. Galaxy Express said that GX would use existing
hardware to minimize development costs. This
was certainly true of the planned first stage, but the second stage, which required the
development of an untried LNG propulsion system and of cutting edge high-pressure tank
materials, was an entirely different matter. This
aspect, all the more puzzling in the wake of the high-cost J1 program failure, may have
been created as a way to justify the substantial government investment. In order to fund the work, the second stage project
had to provide new technology for Japan.
Unfortunately, the effort gradually
shifted from a development program into a costly research project that fell nearly
one-half decade behind schedule. GX development was finally halted by Japan's
government in December 2009.
GX Development
The National Space Development Agency of
Japan (NASDA, since renamed Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA), was tasked with
leading the development of the second stage and its new liquefied natural gas (LNG)
propulsion system. The stage would be the
worlds first LNG orbital rocket stage. The
program got off to a bad start when approval for the expected three-year-long LNG
development effort was delayed until March 2003. By
that time the LNG stage project alone was expected to cost $384 million to $427 million.
By the end of 2003, a full-scale model of
the planned second stage cryogenic composite fuel tanks had been tested in ambient and
cryogenic temperatures. Not all objectives
were fulfilled during these tests. Structural
testing was also performed on hardware designed to hold the planned cluster of four
composite cryogenic tanks. The novel tank
structure consisted of aluminum liner wrapped in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP). The design called for two LNG tanks and
two LOX tanks to be bundled together, along with several sizable helium pressurization
tanks.
A 353 second Mission Duty
Cycle firing demonstration of the LNG engine was performed during 2003, followed by
a Battleship Firing Test for the entire LNG propulsion system, using heavy
thick-wall tanks.
By the end of 2004, JAXA was still
performing structural testing of the composite cryogenic propellant tanks. The LNG igniter was tested during 2004. Some unexpected results occurred during the
testing, requiring modifications to the design. Problems
also cropped up during firing tests of a one-fifth scale model of the LNG engine when the
injector failed at the time of engine cutoff. The
failure, caused by abnormal combustion resulting from the backward flow of combustion gas
from the combustion chamber back to the injector, required more design effort.
GX
Shape Shifter
By late 2006, JAXA and contractor
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries had encountered enough problems with second stage
development to substantially delay the program. Costs
for developing the engine alone had grown to about $300 million, 3.5 times the initial
estimate, which meant that the second stage project cost had grown to something like $600
million. Problems with the CFRP tanks had
finally forced a switch to stainless steel tanks. The
planned pressure fed engine design was also reconsidered, with boost pumps added to feed
propellant to the engine.
While JAXA and IHI struggled with second
stage development, and while the entire GX development effort suffered criticism for its
rising costs, Lockheed Martin maintained a completed GX first stage in storage at its
ex-General Dynamics factory in San Diego, California.
Lockheed's shift of its space launch business to the United Launch Alliance
consortium in December 2006 clouded the picture. By 2008, it was not at all clear
that ULA would be able to produce Atlas III based stages for GX. By 2007, schedules
called for GX first flight in 2011 or 2012, but it was not apparant when or if the rocket
would ever fly.
JAXA performed a successful full scale
test of the LNG upper stage engine during October 2007, but the overall development budget
was cut by 2/3rds for 2008. According to some reports, consideration was given to
cancelling the program in May 2008.
In early 2009, United Launch Alliance
released new information about the GX program. According to the ULA update, Galaxy
Express had dropped the Atlas III based first stage in favor of an Atlas V Common Core
Booster, powered by an RD-180 engine. GX would also use Atlas V avionics. The
JAXA LNG stage would essentially replace the Atlas V 401 Centaur stage to create the
GX rocket. ULA also said that GX would initially fly from Vandenberg AFB, with the
first of two test flights expected to occur in 2012. From Vandenberg, GX was
expected to be able to lift about 3 metric tonnes to a 500 km sun sychronous low earth
orbit, an improvement on the original Atlas III based design.
GX Program Cancelled
In late 2009, Japan's government
cancelled funding for the GX program. On January 15, 2010, IHI liquidated the Galaxy
Express joint venture. The company said that $778 million had been spent by all
participants on the effort, but that an additional $1.04 billion was required to complete
development.
Vehicle Configurations
| |
LEO Payload
(metric tons)
(1) 200 km x 30 deg
(2) 800 km x 98 deg |
GTOx28.5 deg Payload
(metric tons) |
Configuration |
Liftoff
Height
(meters) |
Liftoff
Mass
(metric tons) |
Price (2005)
$Millions
|
GX
(2004 Design) |
4.4 t (1)
2.0 t (2) |
1.4 t (using solid 3rd stg) |
Atlas III Stg1 + LNG Stg2 |
48 m |
210 t |
Unknown
|
Vehicle Components
| |
Stage 1
Single Stage Atlas |
Stage 2 (2004) |
Stage 2 (2007) |
Payload
Fairing |
| Diameter (m) |
3.1 m |
3.3 m |
3.3 m |
3.3 m |
| Length (m) |
30.6 m |
7.8 m |
8 m |
9.6 m |
| Empty Mass (tonnes) |
14 t |
2.1 t |
2.6 t |
1 t |
| Propellant Mass (tonnes) |
183 t |
9.9 t |
17 t |
|
| Total Mass (tonnes) |
197 t |
12 t |
19.6 t |
|
| Engine |
RD-180 |
LNG |
LNG |
|
| Mfgr |
Energomash |
IHI |
IHI |
|
| Propellants |
RP-1/LOX |
LNG/LOX |
LNG/LOX |
|
Thrust
(SL tons) |
390 t |
|
|
|
Thrust
(Vac tons) |
423 t |
9.89 t |
12 t |
|
| ISP (SL sec) |
311 s |
|
|
|
| ISP (Vac sec) |
338 s |
355 s |
323 s |
|
| Burn Time (sec) |
237 s |
342 s |
480 s |
|
| No. Engines/Motors |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Comments
|
Turbopump fed throttleable
Full gimbal control |
He gas pressure-fed
restartable
Gimbal/GN2 jet control |
Boost pump-fed restartable
Gimbal/GN2 jet control |
|
References
"Outline of GX Launch Services", Galaxy Express
Corporation, August 2005
"GX Launch Vehicle, Easy Access to Space", Galaxy Express Corporation, December
2004
"LNG Propulsion System", JAXA, 2004
Last Update: January 24, 2010
by: Ed Kyle |